Try now, no signup required!
The skills and competencies relevant to the human experience are relative. Running speed is irrelevant unless you know how fast…
October 8, 2021 | 4 mins read
The skills and competencies relevant to the human experience are relative. Running speed is irrelevant unless you know how fast the fastest man on earth can run. Intelligence is subjective unless you compare the IQ of the top minds around the globe and determine a benchmark for high intelligence. Even beauty is best judged when compared to a group of individuals with clearly defined parameters.
One of the best ways to capture human ability and performance in a relative manner is by conducting a norm-referenced evaluation . In this piece, we will look beyond the norm-referenced test definition and explore with examples what these tests are, how they are applied. Finally, we will evaluate norm-referenced test advantages and disadvantages .
A norm-referenced test is a standardized test or assessment that attempts to rank an individual test-taker in comparison to a subset of the population that also took the same test. Normally, a specific skill, trait, or criterion is defined for the comparative assessment. All test-takers are measured under similar circumstances or against a predefined average when ranking or position their performance.
One of the most popular norm-referenced test examples is comparing a person’s IQ to the benchmark IQ for average intelligence, which is 80. If a person taking a standardized IQ test achieves a score of 100, their intelligence level may be considered above average. A score below 80, on the other hand, could raise flags for special needs or learning impediments.
As per the norm-referenced test definition , the results of such an assessment would yield either a curve or spectrum along which all test-takers can be plotted. Norm-referenced tests can be categorized into various types.
Norm-referenced tests are designed to measure the relative performance of test-takers instead of their absolute skill or understanding level. The questions in a norm-referenced test are usually multiple-choice and objective, rarely involving subjective answers. Therefore, the different types of norm-referenced tests can be defined not on the basis of their design but on how their results are plotted. These are:
On the positive side, a norm-referenced evaluation is easy and cost-efficient to develop and administer. Usually multiple choice in nature, a norm-referenced evaluation is more objective than subjectively designed criterion-referenced tests.
However, on the downside, despite their standardized and high-quality design, norm-referenced tests can’t determine the actual learning or skill level of test-takers in an absolute sense. This proves to be a big roadblock with norm-referenced tests in education because they diverge from the state-defined norms of achieving a standard skill or knowledge level as per grade.
As is evident from the norm-referenced test examples discussed above, these tests find very specific applications. Norm-referenced tests are the way to go when it isn’t imperative to ensure a learning level among all test-takers or selection has to be made from a limited group irrespective of the candidates’ absolute abilities. In any other context, norm-referenced tests are better considered in conjunction with other assessments or achievements. Join the Inspiring Faculty Program offered by Harappa right now, to gain full learning benefits.
Explore Harappa Diaries to learn more about topics such as Definition of Criterion-Referenced Test, Meaning Of Organizational Agility, Benefits Of Personalized Learning and How to create Individual Development Plan For Employees that will help organizations tap into employee potential.
